From Ned Lamont's issues pages:
I'm not denying that this city has its own problems, but not one of these guys is interested in solving them. So they should stop using Hartford's name for their own gain.
"Ladies and gentleman, the loser in this case is the city of Hartford."
-- Prosecutor Michael Gailor during closing arguments in the corruption trial of Mayor Eddie Perez (as reported by the Courant)
Truer words may never have been spoken.
I didn't pay attention to the Perez trial as much as I should have. Part of the reason for that was life getting in the way -- I was working on a trial myself on the day Perez's trial started. The main I didn't track the mayor's trial closely, though, was simple: The trial was damn depressing. Sure, I'd read the articles leading up to Perez's arrest and I read the charges, so I knew what the testimony would be about. But actually reading the testimony about the blatant corruption going on at City Hall was somehow different, more real. I didn't have the stomach to read all the details every day.
I was also disgusted that Perez didn't step down after he was arrested, or at least during his trial. How often could he possibly have been at City Hall during the past month of his trial? I don't doubt that his staff has always done the day-to-day business of running the city (and frankly, I think his hands-off management style exacerbates Hartford's problems), but that's not the point. I, as a Hartford taxpayer, was paying Perez's salary while he was in no way capable of doing his job because he was in court every day. It make me slightly crazy to think about that.
My fair city now joins the ranks of Connecticut cities whose mayors have been convicted of corruption. I don't know what it is about being a mayor that goes to some men's heads. Is it that men who are prone to being bribed are the ones who run for public office? Or is it that once you win that position in City Hall, you get so cut off from the average citizen that you actually believe it's OK to accept favors and cut no-bid deals in exchange for votes? Is the mentality that as the mayor, you actually deserve those favors, like they're part of your benefits package?
Perez's supporters (yes, he apparently still has a number of them) reportedly chanted "This isn't over" after the verdict was read. Unfortunately, they're right. Perez won't be sentenced until September and then there's the appeal he promised, so for at least the next few months, we'll all hear about and read letters in support of Perez, reports about the good things he's accomplished, etc. And I'm sure that most of those letters will speak to actual accomplishments of Perez. In his time as mayor, I'm sure he did accomplish things that people remember and appreciate and served to better the city. Ultimately, though, he'll only be remembered as yet another crooked Connecticut politician and an example of everything that's wrong with Hartford. He'll just be more fodder for the online trolls who trash our city at every opportunity. Once again, Hartford comes out the loser. And for me, that's the saddest part of this whole debacle.

I've been a registered voter since I turned 18. I've owned and registered a car since 2006. But it seems that buying a house is what finally got me called for jury duty here in good ol' Hartford. (Or maybe being a lawyer – a coworker also just got called for jury duty, as did two other lawyers I know.)
Maybe I'm just a total nerd about this because I'm a lawyer, but I pretty much found the whole process fascinating. (Though I did have a brief freak-out about whether I would be in the pool for the Cheshire home invasion trial, but it turns out that jury selection is happening down in New Haven.) Like a good little potential juror, I filled out my initial screening form and sent it in, waited for the papers to arrive a week before my scheduled date, and called the jury administration number to see if I was excused from appearing. The recording had a list of maybe 20 people who didn't have to show, but I wasn't among them.
On my assigned day, I pulled into the designated juror lot next to the Hartford criminal courthouse (surprisingly, they don't ask to see your papers before letting you park there) at about 8:10am and waited for the doors to open at 8:15am. The crowd was pretty big. Some people got turned away at the door because only the jury pool is permitted through that early. Everyone else has to wait until normal business hours to get in. Jurors get a special elevator up to their special floor, where we had to check in first with a guy who made sure we filled out our juror information cards correctly and second with our handlers, who took our forms, made us sign in, and handed us JUROR stickers. We were to wear them in a visible location at all times, so judges, court personnel, attorneys and everyone else could easily identify us.
The juror floor isn't a bad place to spend a day. Plenty of chairs, TV, pretty pictures of Hartford and some surrounding towns on the walls, a "library" of paperbacks on a bookshelf, free coffee and water and tea, vending machines, even a quiet lounge. Once we were all herded into the main room, we listened to a short presentation on the nitty-gritty of jury duty – where to park, the lunch break, how to prove to your employer that you had jury duty, your employer's obligation to pay you for the day, what to do if you're self-employed or have daycare expenses, etc. The big take-away was that jurors should expect to be there for the day. Lots of grumbling about that.
Next up was a speech by Judge Michael Sheldon of the Superior Court. I assume the judges rotate the responsibility of talking to jury pools, but I could be wrong. Judge Sheldon spoke to us for 15-20 minutes about the jury selection process (known as voir dire), the importance of our service, our role in the process. Then, after a brief break, we watched the infamous jury duty video. All I'll say about the video is that Judge Sheldon was a lot more interesting. Note to the judicial branch: Time to update the video. I recommend using Judge Sheldon as a narrator.
Shortly after the video, the jury handlers (I assume they have a much more official title, but I kept thinking of them as our handlers) began reading off lists of 20-30 people. Each group gathered at the front of the room and was led by a court officer to a courtroom for voir dire. I was called for the third or fourth group at about 10:30am.
Once our group gathered, we trooped down to a very small criminal courtroom, where the 30 of us filled the jury box and almost every other seat in the room. (Some groups were led across the street to the civil courthouse for voir dire.) Judge Julia Dewey introduced herself and the case, and we were sworn in by the court officer. The prosecutor introduced herself and named the other attorneys and investigators who worked on the case. Defense counsel did the same, and also introduced his client, who was accused of murder. Anyone who recognized any of the people involved was asked to raise their hands. We trooped out of the courtroom to a jury room, and one-by-one each of us was called in for voir dire. The people who knew anyone involved with the case went first, and were dismissed quickly. The rest of us were called in order of our jury numbers. There was a lot of waiting.
I got called in just before the 1pm lunch break. I wasn't really expecting to be chosen for the jury because I'm a lawyer, but one of my colleagues has served on two juries, so you never know. I sat in the witness box and the prosecutor asked me maybe six questions, all of which concerned me being an attorney. Defense counsel didn't ask me anything. I was excused to stand in the hall for about 30 seconds, and when I went back in, I was excused. I returned to the jury floor, where I was told that I wasn’t needed because so many cases had settled that morning. After grabbing lunch, I was back at work before 2pm.
My take-aways from and recommendations about the experience?